The importance of regularly performing effective and timely disinfection processes on surfaces of your workplace or other areas exposed to high levels of infectious materials and bacteria is more than just a matter of cleanliness. Properly performing these steps ensures that all possible sources of contamination are eliminated and your workplace or other areas remain free of the harmful effects of these contaminants. The process of thorough disinfection involves the removal of biological hazards from surfaces, equipment and surroundings. In many instances, manual disinfection or using chemical disinfectants may not be enough to remove all types of pathogens and are therefore either required or recommended by OSHA. However, if you utilize an effective Fogging and Electrostatic Sprayer, then you can greatly improve upon the efficacy of your manual disinfection efforts.
It is important to recognize the specific risks associated with the various methods of cleaning. For example, biological hazards are more likely to cause worker injury than other hazardous materials such as chemicals. Therefore, if your company uses these methods, then you should use the appropriate Fogging and Electrostatic Extraction methods depending on the type of hazard that is present. Fogging involves the application of a foaming agent which irritates the surface and generally works best on porous materials. When dealing with large or well-furnished areas, it may be necessary to use an entire line of Fogging and Electrostatic Extraction products.
Best cleaning services Sydney Electrostatic Disinfection methods are often used when dealing with small or confined areas. The methods available for this purpose include Bubble Irrigation, Bubble Blowing, Spray Curing and Vacuuming. The Bubble Blowing method involves the use of compressed air in an attempt to create a puddling or wet area where biological hazards can thrive. Unfortunately, there is no way to prevent the escape of airborne viruses and bacteria through these porous surfaces, but frequent use of this method can help to reduce the chances of contamination.
Chemical Methods: Biological hazards can be reduced by the employment of specific chemical solutions. While they are not always as effective as Fogging and Electrostatic Extraction, the chemicals generally do a better job at protecting surfaces and are less likely to produce undesirable odours and surface damages. The most commonly used chemical disinfectants are: Methylene Chloride (Methylene Chloroform)
Methylene Chloride: Also known as MCL, this chemical is a common component of detergents and other cleaning solutions. It is an effective disinfectant and is used in a variety of industries. As such, it can help to prevent the spread of various forms of infection, such as Staphylococcus aureus, a potentially deadly infection caused by bacteria. As well, it helps to reduce the number of illnesses and infections caused by those bacteria. Regular use of MCL can also help to prevent workers from getting sick on a regular basis and reduce the risk of serious injury or fatality on the job.
The downside of using chlorine is that the fumes emitted by it can be quite irritating and can also trigger allergies and respiratory problems. In addition, the concentrated form of chlorine can be highly dangerous if not used in the correct way. For example, excess exposure to vapours can increase the risk of burning eyes and throat, which are especially problematic for individuals who already have respiratory problems. Fogging can effectively neutralize chlorine fumes but, because of its expense, not many companies choose to use it.
Electrostatic Extraction: Similar to MCL, ESED uses electricity to carry out its cleaning process. Unlike MCL, however, it does not release any harmful gases during the process. This method is also more expensive and is only commonly used in larger worksites. Additionally, frequent recharging is necessary to maintain the applicability of electrodes.
Although many other disinfectants can be used to disinfect areas contaminated with biological hazards, no other method is as widely used and efficient as the use of chlorine on a regular basis. However, because of the high costs associated with using MCL, the use of other disinfectants is recommended to mitigate the risk of contamination and the need for expensive clean-up efforts. Clean Group Companies also take special care to ensure that workers are trained in the use of these methods, in order to minimize the risk of contact with potentially harmful waste products. In the event that toxic waste should leak or contaminate, they should be able to quickly identify and correct the problem and prevent further contamination.